 |
History of
Retainers: At the time rotary ball bearings were
invented, they had no retainers. This caused the operating
noise to be loud; it also shortened there running life and
lowered there operating speeds.
8 years later,
bearings with retainers were developed. This type had
quieter operation and |
|
|
was capable of high rotational speeds.
Although they contained fewer balls in the bearings, they
also had excellent running
life.
The history of the needle bearing also reveals how the quality
improved through the use of retainers. Balls at their
point of contact slip against each other in opposite
directions. This contact slip is at twice the speed of each
balls rotation. The slip results in severe wear, louder noise, and a
shorter running life. The massive
pressures and metal-to-metal slip between the balls will also
break down the oil film which breaks down at 3kg/mm2 of
surface pressure.
Alternatively,
retainers and balls contact each other,
which prevents the break down of oil and provides for
quieter operation, high rotational speeds, and longer
running life.
|
|
|
|
Full
Ball Type vs. Present Bearing with Ball Retainers
|
In
the first stage of development
(Full
ball type)
|
Full
Ball Type
-
Adjacent
balls contact each other at a point. As a result, the
contact stress is large and the oil film breaks down due
to friction.
-
The
life becomes shorter.
|
Present bearing
(with ball retainers)
|
Present
bearing with ball retainers
-
The
life is extended due to the absence of friction.
-
Heat
generation during high-speed rotation is limited due to
the absence of the friction between adjacent balls.
-
The
balls do not contact each other. Noise does not arise
from the metal to metal contact.
-
Balls
move smoothly because they are positioned evenly.
-
The
lubricating oil retained between the balls provides
excellent lubrication and long life.
|
|
|
|
Conventional, Full
Ball LM Guide
|
The Revolutionary
Ball cage Design
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of THK's Caged Ball
|
|
Low Noise:
The balls, retained by the ball cage, do not contact each
other. Thus, the guide runs without metallic noise,
which provides for low running sound levels: less
overall noise.
Type SHS has ball-circulating
sections made of resin molded in the block.
This structure eliminates metallic noise caused by balls
contacting the block. The employment of ball retainers has
also eliminated metallic noise produced by balls hitting
each other. Thus, type SHS operate quietly even at high
speeds. In addition, the ball retainers are effective in
preventing balls from rubbing against each other, resulting
in low heat generation and a super high speed performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance-Free Operation: Adjacent balls, retained by the ball
cage, do not rub against each other and produce friction.
As a result, the balls are not subject to wear and particle
generation. In addition, the grease retention has been
enhanced, providing long-term, maintenance-free operation.
In
fact, tests have been run in which the new bearing design
has lasted 28,000 Km on the initial shot of grease.
Compare this to the lubrication interval of a convention
linear guide which is 100 km. In most cases, this
eliminates the need for lubrication or forced lubrication
systems. This results in a tremendous reduction in
machine building costs and a positive environmental effect
as well.
|

Non-Caged
(Ball to Ball Contact)
Non-Caged:
Subject to
high bearing stress due to point contact. This high
stress breaks down the grease film and generates particle as
the balls wear against each other.

Caged ball
(No Ball to Ball Contact)
Caged
Ball: Extremely
low bearing stress due to the contact between the ball cage
and the balls means the grease film does not degrade and
there is no particle generation. The ball cage also
forms a grease pocket, further increasing the life of the
lubrication.
|
|
|
|
Higher
Speed and Longer Life: The ball retainers exhibit
excellent high-speed performance though reduced heat
generation due to lower bearing stress and the 50% reduction
in ball contact velocity. The life of the balls is
prolonged due to the elimination of friction and particle
generation due to wear between adjacent balls. Since
the balls are separated, there is less of a tendency for the
balls to jam up in the block during higher acceleration.
This means that higher velocities and higher accelerations
are possible. While conventionally designed bearings
are generally limited to 2.5 G's of acceleration, and 5.0
m/s of velocity, there are applications running now
with caged ball technology at
well over 5 G's and 8 m/s.
|
|
|
|
|
Low Dusting:
Dusting tests have shown that Caged Ball LM Guides generate
much lower amounts of dust during use as a results of the
elimination of the ball to ball contact. When
ball to ball point contact occurs, high stress occurs in the
grease film used to lubricate the balls. This stress
will break down the lube film and steel to steel contact
contact will occur. This contact creates debris as the
surfaces move against each other. The double lip seal
that is used on all caged ball LM Guides to retain the
grease within the block also provides another level of
protection from particles that are generated within the
block. The lower dust generating characteristic makes
these types of LM Guides especially suitable for clean room
applications.
|

Dusting with Non-Caged Type

Dusting with Caged Type
|
|
|
|
|
Rolling
Resistance and variation reduced by 90%: Metallic noise
is suppressed due to the elimination of friction between the
balls. Smoother movement with less variation of torque can
be obtained since the balls are lined uniformly and
circulated without jamming. This reduction in torque
variation results in less overshoot and much more precise
movements.
For
more information on cage ball technology call Techmaster,
Inc. or THK.

Note:
The majority of the information on the caged ball technology
above was taken from THK's web site.
|

Convention Bearing
Rolling Resistance Variation

Ball Cage Design
Rolling Resistance Variation
|
|